No future?

“No future, no future, no future for you”
Sex Pistols, “God Save The Queen”

Just how bleak is the future of radio?  Eric Rhodes of Radio Ink had this to write after attending a media conference:

After the conference, I had a meeting with a prominent radio colleague and we shared horror stories about missteps in our industry. He feels radio is making too many foolish mistakes. I don’t entirely disagree.

As I traveled to the airport and then home I realized I was depressed, and I could not understand why. Then it struck me. Radio is flat, radio is not innovating, radio is not doing much of anything new. In contrast, I saw all these companies doing exciting things, changing consumer behavior and innovating. I wanted that for radio.

Though my depression has passed, I am concerned that we as an industry are not breaking our chains from the past. Do our stations really sound any different than they did five years ago? How about 30 years ago? Most morning shows sound pretty much the same, and have since Scott Shannon and Steve Kingston innovated the Z Morning Zoo decades ago. Our playlists continue to repeat “the biggest hits,” and even our sounders and ID voiceovers sound about the same as they have since Star Wars (and light saber sound effects) came out. What are we doing to reflect today?

This is a good question.  What is radio doing to reflect today?  What is it doing to attract young listeners?

Pssst!  Hey, kids!  Your parents used to listen to Z-100!  What do you mean that’s not exciting?  Fine, go listen to your iPod.  Waste your allowance money on a Spotify subscription.  You’ll only get what you want when you want it.  After you get tired of that, what’s left?

Eric Rhodes continues with a suggestion to make radio exciting:

Is it possible that our 1 to 2 percent growth industry could break out into the stratosphere if we tried something new to reinvigorate our stations, electrify our listeners, and bring up time spent listening? I encourage station owners and groups to take their few unsuccessful signals, find some 20-year-olds to staff them, and let them try something new. Though it seems impractical and possibly even irresponsible, that’s exactly how FM killed AM. (And the lower spotloads also had a lot to do with it.)

Well, why not?  Let’s turn the clock back 30+ years ago, and look at a little FM station known as WLIR.  At the time they were deciding on a new direction for the station.  They could have chosen and adult contemporary format, and taken the safe road, or try this “new music” that no one else was touching.  They decided to take a risk, and play artists like the Sex Pistols, The Ramones, and U2.  In doing so, they found a fiercely dedicated (and youthful) audience, and made radio exciting.

Could something similar happen in 2014?  Could WRXP rise from the ashes once again, offering something dramatically different from what can be gotten from the on-demand world of Spotify?  Which struggling FM can/will be transformed itself into something vibrant and exciting?  Only the future knows.


Author: Chuck

I started out as a child, then things kind of grew from there.  I spend way too much time around computers and radios, but I do like to take a break once in a while.  I'm not a real doctor, but I played one on the radio in college. A bit later on, I wrote an article that was published in COMPUTE!'s Gazette (Commodore 64/128 magazine). I also think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.

2 thoughts on “No future?”

  1. “Could WRXP rise from the ashes once again, offering something dramatically different from what can be gotten from the on-demand world of Spotify? ”

    From your lips to God’s ears! Q101 in Chicago is going back to alternative. Could NY be far behind? I’d love to see WLIR come back… a girl can dream!


  2. Radio plays it safe and does not take risks because the owners paid too much money for the signals, so they don’t want a ratings failure, so they go with what worked in the past,

    Unfortunately, the past is history. It used to be the only place to hear music was on the radio. No longer with the internet. You can listen to anything from anywhere.

    So the challenge for radio is how to remain relevant to today. Internet radio stations will never be anything more than a jukebox playing music. There are way too many of them to be able to attract a sizable enough audience to sell to advertisers. Fortunately radio stations can still reach a broad audience, but mostly in cars. So they need to be entertaining, not just a jukebox that you can find on the internet.

    Check out CBS-FM in New York. They get radio. Highly entertaining and fun the listen to. Any radio station could do this with any type of music. The problem is there are not that many entertaining DJs.

    I was amazed that the reconstituted WRXP was able to pull a 2 share being an automated jukebox. Goes to show the popularity of modern rock. Imagine if they added an entertaining DJ. They should easily get a 3 share with the right talent. But in the end, modern rock is a young white male audience, and for some reason, advertisers not not that interested in it.


Have something to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s